• 作者:shongvs
  • 积分:561
  • 等级:五年级
  • 2025/10/25 21:50:49
  • 楼主(阅:103/回:0)HoTT的专业学术社区

    主要学术交流平台

    [list=1][*]

    Homotopy Type Theory / Univalent Foundations Zulip Chat

    [list][*]

    网址: https://hott.zulipchat.com/

    [*]

    特点: 这是当前HoTT领域最活跃、最核心的实时交流平台。几乎所有该领域的顶尖研究者、教授和博士生都在这里。讨论氛围非常专业且友好。

    [*]

    推荐频道:

    [list][*]

    #general: 用于发布你的核心问题。

    [*]

    #theory: 讨论类型论本身的基础问题。

    [*]

    #philosophy: 讨论数学哲学,非常适合你的“连续统幽灵”和“动态生成”问题。

    [*]

    #computer science 或 #PL: 讨论与编程语言、形式验证相关的应用。

    [/list][/list][*]

    Homotopy Type Theory Mailing List

    [list][*]

    网址: https://groups.google.com/g/homotopytypetheory

    [*]

    特点: 这是一个邮件列表,节奏比Zulip慢,但帖子通常更正式、更完整。适合发布长篇、深思熟虑的论述。

    如何有效地提问和发起讨论

    为了让你的想法获得最好的反馈,我建议你这样组织你的帖子:

    标题示例:

    [list][*]

    Formalizing "Learning Types" and Dynamic Type Generation in HoTT?

    [*]

    Could HoTT describe a "becoming" process, not just a "being" state?

    [*]

    The "Continuous Ghost" in our Foundations: A question about discrete/finite alternatives to HoTT

    [/list]

    内容结构建议:

    [list=1][*]

    清晰的背景陈述 (Brief Context):

    [list][*]

    "I've been thinking about how to formalize a lifelong learning AI system within a type-theoretic framework, and I've encountered a fundamental puzzle regarding the static nature of HoTT..."

    [/list][*]

    核心问题 (The Core Problem):

    [list][*]

    清晰地描述“正在学习的类型”这一困境。使用你提出的 CanRecognizeCats 的例子。强调 HoTT 似乎只描述了状态的转换(¬P -> P),而没有描述能力的 “生成事件” 本身。

    [/list][*]

    与现有概念的连接 (Linking to Known Concepts):

    [list][*]

    这表明你做足了功课。可以这样写:“This seems related to the concept of Modal Type Theory (specifically temporal modalities), but I'm unsure if it fully captures the idea of a type universe that itself is expanding. It also reminds me of Open Type Theory and Reflection in programming languages.”

    [/list][*]

    具体的问题 (Specific Questions for the Community):

    [list][*]

    提出明确的问题,引导讨论:

    [list][*]

    "Has there been any work on introducing a notion of 'real-time' or 'historical time' into HoTT, distinct from the 'proof-relevant' paths?"

    [*]

    "Is there a formalism that can describe the process of a new type being 'born' into the universe, perhaps through a meta-rule or an agent's action?"

    [*]

    "Could the Univalence Axiom be reinterpreted in a setting where the universe is not static but dynamically growing?"

    [/list][/list][*]

    分享你的初步构想 (Share Your Thought Experiment):

    [list][*]

    可以简要提及你“时间第一性”的数学思想实验,作为激发讨论的催化剂。例如:"As a thought experiment, I've considered a foundation where the basic unit is not a static type but a rule executing in discrete time. Would such a 'process-first' approach be compatible with, or even help explain, the geometric intuitions of HoTT?"

    [/list][/list]

    [/list][/list]

    跑跑啦航模

    讯客分类信息网


    目前不允许游客回复,请 登录 注册 发表言论。